01
Representation
We look for breadth in the artists, programmes, subjects and perspectives included across the resource.
Editorial principles
The Tetley Story considers how an resource can represent people, practices and communities with care, clarity and respect.
Our approach
This independent resource aims to make the history of exhibitions, artists and public programmes more accessible. We recognise that cultural records are never complete and that institutional histories can overlook people, experiences and forms of creative practice.
Our editorial work therefore seeks to identify a range of voices and contexts while avoiding claims to speak for communities or individuals. We use plain language, distinguish documented information from interpretation and revise pages when better evidence becomes available.
01
We look for breadth in the artists, programmes, subjects and perspectives included across the resource.
02
We structure pages clearly and explain context so that readers with different levels of familiarity can use the resource.
03
We paraphrase source material responsibly and avoid reproducing harmful or demeaning language.
04
We welcome corrections and make the limits of this independent resource visible to readers.
Equity is treated here as an ongoing editorial responsibility rather than a completed outcome. Summaries may identify gaps in the surviving record, describe barriers to participation or place a project within wider social and cultural conditions. They do not replace the testimony or expertise of the people involved.
The resource will continue to be reviewed as new documentation, perspectives and corrections come to light. To flag an issue, email the page URL, the detail concerned and any supporting information.
About this site
The Tetley Story is an informational resource exploring exhibitions, artists, programmes and the changing history of a contemporary art gallery. It is not an official institutional website and does not represent the gallery.
Read the resource overview →